RenaSci New Science Scholarly Curation in the AI Era

Scholarly card · demo

Achievements, not a list of papers

A demonstration card: achievements, a multimodal biography, a network map, and mutual review in place of paper counts and impact factors. The real version is generated from works, raids, and review records on the platform.

Lv.7 curator · sample data

Hu Yilin

Philosophy of technology · scholarly curation · Singapore

4.8 Mutual review (23 people + AI)

Achievements

📜Six manifesto revisionsv0.1 → v0.6
📖Founded the first issueAfter Papers
⚔️Wendao prototypeP0 playable
⚖️Wenheng designSix-axis evaluation
🏪Unfinished BookstoreWeekly reading group
🛡️First raidLocked

Every trophy points to a work or record that can be opened; a retracted result forfeits its trophy.

Multimodal biography

  1. 2010sHistory of science and philosophy of technology, Beijing
  2. 2020sCo-founded a tech-art studio in Hong Kong
  3. 2024Singapore: CNDAO · Unfinished Bookstore
  4. 2026RenaSci / New Science: manifesto, platform, Wendao

Compiled by the person together with AI: text, timeline, diagrams, and explanations to hear and watch, updated as work accumulates.

Network

Hu Readers Tianyu TBC Codex Claude

Collaborators, reviewers, raid teammates, and AI collaboration records all belong to the network.

Comments and ratings

AI

"Curation instead of papers: the argument is complete and the product partly shipped; next, whether raids and cards truly accumulate."

★★★★☆
Users

23 ratings, of achievements and works themselves, not counts or journal names.

★★★★★

Grounding: DORA (2012) and the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015): quantitative evaluation should support, not supplant, qualitative expert judgement.

See the social layer on the map Manifesto · blueprint